ABSTRACT
Objectives This article observes the mean daily dose of fentanyl required for adequate sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated children randomized to receive dexmedetomidine or placebo.Methods We conducted Dexmedetomidine Opioid Sparing Effect in Mechanically Ventilated Children (DOSE), a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating trial. We enrolled children aged 35 weeks postmenstrual to 17 years (inclusive) admitted across 13 pediatric multidisciplinary and cardiac intensive care units. Adequate sedation was based on a State Behavioral Score and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of -1 or lower. Only the first two dexmedetomidine dosing cohorts opened for enrollment, due to early trial closure during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic. Thirty children were randomized over 13 months and included in the analyses.Results Demographic and baseline characteristics were not different between dexmedetomidine and placebo cohorts. Similarly, mean daily fentanyl use was not different, using an unadjusted mixed regression model that considered treatment, time, and a treatment-by-time interaction. Adverse events and safety events of special interest were not different between cohorts.Conclusion The DOSE trial revealed that dexmedetomidine added to fentanyl does not impact safety and may not spare fentanyl use in critically ill children, although the trial did not meet its recruitment goals, due to early closure during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic. More rigorous inpatient pediatric trials like DOSE that study critically ill, mechanically ventilated children are needed. Despite the many obstacles faced, the DOSE trial presents challenges from which the greater research community can learn and use to optimize future therapeutic trials in children.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study The current depart process resulted in slow work-flow and patient safety and equity concerns. The QI project aimed to improve resident satisfaction with the hospital discharge process. Methods Used The QI project was designed using the Model for Improvement. Starting April 2020, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles included: hiring clinical team coordinators;creating standard depart instructions for diabetic ketoacidosis, pyelonephritis, seizures, croup and dehydration;uploading instructions to Powerchart;and clinician reminders to use instructions with families. Measures examined monthly, included resident satisfaction and patient readmissions. Summary of Results Resident satisfaction improved from 4.8 (February 2020) to 7.8 (August 2020) for the overall discharge process;from 5.3 to 7.9 for family education on all key points;from 6.0 to 7.7 for smooth transition of care;from 3.0 to 7.4 for no language barriers;and from 3.0 to 6.7 for no unnecessary delays, on a scale of 0/strongly disagree/ terrible to 10/strongly agree/excellent. Readmissions also trended downward. Conclusions During this QI project to address the depart process, resident satisfaction improved and readmissions declined. These results are encouraging, but should be interpreted in the context of decreased patient census due to COVID-19 and non-respiratory season, which may have decreased workload and increased education time and interpreter access. Next steps include PDSAs related to health literacy and Spanish translation.